Question 1

How does NeuroFrame assess candidates?

Accepted Answer

Candidates play a 30-minute adaptive mobile game. During gameplay, the ML engine captures 4,000+ behavioral micro-signals — reaction times, decision patterns, strategy adaptations, stress responses — and generates an 8-competency cognitive-personality profile using machine learning models trained on 25,000+ validated profiles.

Question 2

How long does the assessment take?

Accepted Answer

The game takes approximately 30 minutes. Reports are generated in under 60 seconds after completion. No additional assessor time required.

Question 3

Can candidates cheat or fake the assessment?

Accepted Answer

No. The system observes behavioral patterns (reaction times, decision sequences, strategy changes) that are extremely difficult to consciously manipulate. There is no "right answer" to game for, unlike questionnaire-based assessments.

Question 4

What is the scientific validity of NeuroFrame?

Accepted Answer

NeuroFrame achieves a Confirmatory Fit Index (CFI) of 0.96, Cronbach's alpha of 0.74, ROC AUC of 0.77, and a predictive validity correlation of r = 0.87 with on-the-job performance ratings. Test-retest reliability exceeds 0.83.

Question 5

What competencies does NeuroFrame measure?

Accepted Answer

NeuroFrame measures 8 competencies: Strategic Thinking, Adaptability, Attention to Detail, Decision Making, Teamwork, Leadership, Stress Resilience, and Creative Problem Solving. Each is measured independently using dedicated behavioral markers.

Question 6

What devices are supported?

Accepted Answer

Any modern smartphone, tablet, or desktop with a web browser. No app installation required. Works on iOS Safari, Android Chrome, and desktop browsers.

Question 7

Is NeuroFrame biased against any demographic group?

Accepted Answer

Extensive Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis confirms no significant score differences by gender, age (25-55), native language, or device type. Regular fairness audits are conducted by external psychometricians. Adverse impact ratios are within EEOC compliance thresholds.

Question 8

How is NeuroFrame different from MBTI, DISC, or Big Five tests?

Accepted Answer

Traditional self-report assessments like MBTI, DISC, and Big Five questionnaires ask people what they think about themselves, making them vulnerable to social desirability bias and faking. NeuroFrame observes actual behavior during a game — reaction times, decision patterns, strategy changes — producing objective data that cannot be gamed. NeuroFrame achieves r = 0.87 predictive validity vs. r = 0.15-0.35 for self-reports.

Original Research on
Human Capital & Deal Intelligence

Latest Deep Dive

The Human Variable: The Most Expensive Risk in M&A that Nobody Prices

Upcoming Research

The Integration Playbook

Measuring Culture Fit Without Bias

The CFO Case for Behavioral DD

Stay Ahead of the Deal

Original Research onHuman Capital & Deal Intelligence